Posts Tagged ‘Performance Measurement’

IT performance – HP CIO Assessment

Tuesday, July 12th, 2011
Report Preview - Overall Performance

Source: HP CIO Assessment - Report Preview - Overall Performance

Good news for IT industry  budgets and spending are increasing this year. According to Wedbush’s survey of 100 IT project managers some of their  conclusions are:

  • 77 percent of respondents expected IT budgets to rise 8 percent in 2011.
  • 59 percent of respondents said they would purchase tablets in the next year, but only 29 percent of those surveyed thought they would replace notebooks. PC demand appears to be solid in business technology.

With these results for 2011 it`s very important for CIOs to measure their department’s performance. Complementing this trend, HP has recently launched the “CIO Assessment tool“, a questionnaire that works like an investment portfolio that is measured against financial indices (peers).

You can choose the industry peers you’d like to be benchmarked against from: Health Care, Financial Services, Government, Manufacturing & Distribution, Technology or Telecommunications divided in four areas:  IT Value, Customer Satisfaction, Operational Excellence and Future Orientation.

Sample questions from each area:

  • IT value: What percentage of your IT expenditure is tracked to business objectives?
  • Customer satisfaction: What is your percentage of deviation from planned hours of work?
  • Operational excellence: How quickly can IT deliver new business services in response to changes in business demand?
  • Future orientation:  What percentage of your IT employees are satisfied with their jobs according to your internal employee satisfaction metrics?

After completing the entire questionnaire you can register and receive your personalized report with detailed recommendations.

Additional resources

iStockAnalist, http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewarticle/articleid/4764470, accessed on 13 July 2011

Enterprise CIO Forum, http://www.enterprisecioforum.com/en/blogs/jdodge/10-minute-questionnaire-assesses-it-performance, accessed on 13 July 2011

States and nations infographic – Matching Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and Population size

Monday, February 14th, 2011

One of the most commented blog articles on The Economist is an dynamic infographic that maps state economies part of the US to their equivalents from around the world in terms of $ GDP and # Population size.

While “The Economist proves itself to be imaginative and interesting in its way of illustrating how our world works” as one of the article commentators is acknowledging, what proves to be really interesting from a performance measurement perspective, is the  interest expressed  by the article viewers to visualize  a comparison between America’s States and rest of the world in term of other performance indicators. As it results from a quick analysis of the opinions expressed in the comments section, the most popular  suggestion is  $ GDP per capita.

Other suggestions for comparison picked out from the article comments section are in terms of:

  • $ Median income
  • # Life expectancy
  • # Child mortality
  • # Geographical size
  • # Resources
  • % Debt from GDP

Source: The Economist, 2011

References

The Economist (2011), US equivalents – Which countries match the GDP and population of America’s states?, available at http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart, (accessed 22 January 2011)

Employee engagement and organisational performance

Friday, August 6th, 2010

Engagement is all about getting employees to ‘give it their all’. Various research studies show a strong connection between an employee’s level of engagement and the level and quality of work performance.

Elements of engagement

The concept of engagement has naturally evolved from past research on high involvement, empowerment, job motivation, organizational commitment and trust.

Dr. Paul Bernthal (2009) proposes that engagement comprises of individual value, focused work, and interpersonal support with the following sub-components that further define the meaning of engagement:

  • Individual Value - Employees feel more engaged when they are able to make a unique contribution, experience empowerment, and have opportunities for personal growth.  The perception of meaningful work is one of the most influential factors in determining employees’ willingness to stay with an organization.
  • Focused Work – Employees feel more engaged when they have clear direction, performance accountability and an efficient work environment.
  • Interpersonal Support – Employees feel more engaged when they work in a safe, cooperative environment.

Work related roles

“Role theory” reviews different roles that people engage in at work and explains reasons why people engage in certain roles and not in others (Welbourne, 2003). Engagement is about what people do at work.  The Five work-related roles differentiated are:

1. Job holder role – employees come to work and do the job that is listed in their job description.

2. Team member role – employees go “above and beyond” to help members of their team work toward common goals.

3. Entrepreneur role – employees come up with new ideas and processes and try to get those ideas implemented.

4. Career role – employees do things to enhance their career in the organization; they learn, they adapt new skills and more.

5. Organization member role – employees do things that promote and help the company even if it’s not part of their jobs or their team’s duties.

Employee engagement and performance measurement

Researches on employee engagement use different approaches.  According to the global workforce study conducted by Tower Perrins, only a fifth of the respondents can be categorized as engaged (Towers Perrin, 2008). The largest segment, over 40%, is the so-called “enrolled,” perhaps best described as capable but not fully committed. The four categories of employees engagement are presented below:

Source: Towers Perrin, 2008

The same  workforce study reveals that a spread of more than 5% in operating margin and more than 3% in net profit margin was observed between the companies with high employee engagement and those with low engagement. How  engagement affects financial performance and retention in companies is illustrated in the figure below.

Source: Towers Perrin, 2008 (click on the image for larger size)

Another employee engagement research approach was developed by Gallup Consulting, which uses 12 questions (Q12) to measure the employee engagement (Gallup Consulting, 2008). Gallup’s latest meta-analysis (an analysis of data from more than 152 organizations) shows dramatic differences between top and bottom quartile workgroups on key business outcomes, as it is revelead in the the figure below:


Source: Gallup Consulting, 2008, 2010

Answers to the Gallup’s questions (Q12) that measure employee engagement correlate with retention, productivity, customer engagement and safety.

Why is important to measure engagement?

Some companies use engagement scores as lead measures in their HR scorecards. When an organization can show the relationship between engagement scores and bottom-line outcomes, everyone pays attention to the engagement index. Establishing this critical link between people and performance helps HR professionals prove that people-related interventions are a worthwhile investment.

How do you measure the employee engagement in your firm?

For further examples of performance measures and reports explore the Human Resources KPIs in practice section of smartkpis.com (smartKPIs.com 2010). The employee engagement index is available at: http://www.smartkpis.com/kpi-key-performance-indicator/employee-engagement-index-1836.html

References

Bernthal P. 2009, Measuring Employee Engagement, Development Dimensions International, Inc., available at: http://www.ddiworld.com/pdf/ddi_MeasuringEmployeeEngagement_wp.pdf

Gallup Consulting 2008 -2010, Employee Engagement , What’s Your Engagement Ratio?, available at: http://www.gallup.com/consulting/52/employee-engagement.aspx and  http://www.gallup.com/consulting/121535/Employee-Engagement-Overview-Brochure.aspx

Towers Perrin 2008, Global Workforce Survey, Closing the Engagement Gap: A Road Map for Driving Superior Business Performance, available at: http://www.towersperrin.com/tp/getwebcachedoc?webc=HRS/USA/2008/200803/GWS_Global_Report20072008_31208.pdf

Welbourne T. 2003, Employee Engagement: Doing It vs. Measuring, available at: http://www.eepulse.com/documents/pdfs/HR.com-9-8-03.pdf

Let’s Do It! – Clean a Country in One Day – Performance Measurement Case Study

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

The “Let’s do it! ” initiative, a country clean-up project, was born in Estonia in 2008. By mobilizing the wider community, a team of volunteers succeeded in cleaning the waste deposited in many places across the country. Realized exclusively with volunteers, good-will and with the support of technology, the project was of a great success, replicated or in the process of being replicated in 7 other countries: Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovenia, Portugal, India and Italy.

Here are some of the project’s performance measures:

More information

[I] http://www.letsdoitworld.org (accessed on 12 April 2010)

Featured products

$1800 USD
 
$289 USD
 
$99 USD
 
$99 USD
 
$99 USD
 
$183 USD
 
$45 USD
 
$35 USD