Archive for the ‘smartKPIs.com’ Category

New smartKPIs.com Report Ranks the Top Academic Education KPIs of 2010

Thursday, August 25th, 2011

August 25, 2011, Melbourne, Australia – smartKPIs.com, the world’s largest source of thoroughly documented Key Performance Indicator (KPI) examples announces that Academic performance and Student experience KPIs dominate the “Top 25 Academic Education KPIs of 2010”. The report presents in detail KPIs such as: “% Attendance rate per course”, “% Drop-out rate” and “# National examination score”, among other KPI examples reviewed by the smartKPIs.com research team. “Top KPIs of 2010″ is a collection of research reports discussing the most popular KPIs of 2010 across functional areas and industries. smartKPIs.com is an expert in the field of performance management and measurement, researching the use of KPI based performance management systems in practice around the world.

The “Top 25 Academic Education KPIs of 2010” report provides insights in the state of Academic Education performance measurement today by listing and analyzing the most visited KPIs on smartKPIs.com in 2010. It is part of theTop KPIs of 2010series of reports and a result of the research program conducted by the analysts of smartKPIs.com in the area of integrated performance management and measurement. smartKPIs.com hosts the largest catalogue of thoroughly documented KPI examples available today and representing an excellent platform for research and dissemination of insights on KPIs and related topics. The hundreds of thousands of visits to smartKPIs.com and the thousands of KPIs visited, bookmarked and rated by members of this online community in 2010 provided a rich data set, which combined with further analysis from the editorial team, formed the basis of these research reports. (more…)

New smartKPIs.com Report Ranks the Top Business Consulting KPIs of 2010

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

August 25, 2011, Melbourne, Australia – smartKPIs.com, the world’s largest source of thoroughly documented Key Performance Indicator (KPI) examples announces that Revenue and Positioning KPIs dominate the “Top 25 Business Consulting KPIs of 2010”. The report presents in detail KPIs such as: “% Realization rate”, “# Labor multiplier” and “% Chargeable ratio”, among other KPI examples reviewed by the smartKPIs.com research team. “Top KPIs of 2010″ is a collection of research reports discussing the most popular KPIs of 2010 across functional areas and industries. smartKPIs.com is an expert in the field of performance management and measurement, researching the use of KPI based performance management systems in practice around the world.

The “Top 25 Business Consulting KPIs of 2010” report provides insights in the state of Business Consulting performance measurement today by listing and analyzing the most visited KPIs on smartKPIs.com in 2010. It is part of theTop KPIs of 2010series of reports and a result of the research program conducted by the analysts of smartKPIs.com in the area of integrated performance management and measurement. smartKPIs.com hosts the largest catalogue of thoroughly documented KPI examples available today and representing an excellent platform for research and dissemination of insights on KPIs and related topics. The hundreds of thousands of visits to smartKPIs.com and the thousands of KPIs visited, bookmarked and rated by members of this online community in 2010 provided a rich data set, which combined with further analysis from the editorial team, formed the basis of these research reports. (more…)

New smartKPIs.com Report Ranks the Top Restaurant KPIs of 2010

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2011

August 24, 2011, Melbourne, Australia – smartKPIs.com, the world’s largest source of thoroughly documented Key Performance Indicator (KPI) examples announces that Occupancy and Service KPIs dominate the “Top 25 Restaurant KPIs of 2010”. The report presents in detail KPIs such as: “$ Revenue per available seat hour (RevPASH)”, “% Canceled reservations” and “# Complaints per restaurant order”, among other KPI examples reviewed by the smartKPIs.com research team. “Top KPIs of 2010″ is a collection of research reports discussing the most popular KPIs of 2010 across functional areas and industries. smartKPIs.com is an expert in the field of performance management and measurement, researching the use of KPI based performance management systems in practice around the world.

The “Top 25 Restaurant KPIs of 2010” report provides insights in the state of restaurant performance measurement today by listing and analyzing the most visited KPIs on smartKPIs.com in 2010. It is part of theTop KPIs of 2010series of reports and a result of the research program conducted by the analysts of smartKPIs.com in the area of integrated performance management and measurement. smartKPIs.com hosts the largest catalogue of thoroughly documented KPI examples available today and representing an excellent platform for research and dissemination of insights on KPIs and related topics. The hundreds of thousands of visits to smartKPIs.com and the thousands of KPIs visited, bookmarked and rated by members of this online community in 2010 provided a rich data set, which combined with further analysis from the editorial team, formed the basis of these research reports. (more…)

It is time to reinvent management – You can help

Thursday, August 18th, 2011

smartKPIs.com Performance Architect update 45/2011

An interesting question I came across this week got me thinking. The question, rather rhetorical was along the lines of: “Why follow some model developed by a consultant when hundreds of smart people from hundreds of companies have spend tens of years developing and refining models line Baldrige and EFQM?”

The long answer to such a question, from my perspective is the following:

  • For the same reason the several of the dozen companies involved in the Nolan Norton Institute study experimented in 1990 with Balanced Scorecard prototypes expanded from Art Schneiderman’s original “Corporate Scorecard” piloted at Analog Devices. It is a classic tale of practitioner insight, mixed with academic rigour and consulting acumen and embraced by organizations willing to innovate while contributing to the enrichment of management as a discipline. (Details in the preface of Kaplan and Norton’s 1996 book.)
  • For the same reason Motorola’s CEO Bob Galvin embraced in 1985 the quality improvement ideas expressed in a research report by two of its employees: Mikel Harry, PhD. (academic rigour) and Bill Smith (practitioner insight, with 35 years of experience in engineering and quality assurance). Their proposed MAIC problem-solving approach became a stepping stone in the evolution of  Six Sigma. The D was added by IBM and other early adopters after Motorola winning the Baldrige Award in 1988.
  • For the same reason why after being presented in an efficiency report to the Executive Committee, Donaldson Brown’s return on investment formula was adopted by Du Pont in 1912. Brown was a 27 years old engineering graduate at the time. The subsequent work done by Brown at Du Pont and General Motors is legendary, with many cost accounting techniques and principles such as Return on Investment, Return on Equity, Forecasting and Flexible being established and used in a corporate context. They were gradually adopted by corporate America and grew to became part of the financial fabric of today’s corporate environment.

The short answer to the question is innovation and progress. Management is constructivist in nature. It is based on innovative ideas being proposed, tested and followed as they prove their value.

My 15 years of work as a management practitioner and consultant and 6 years of academic research offered me the opportunity to analyze plenty of models, frameworks, methodologies and abstract concepts. Some of them are puerile, some of them make sense to me, some of them don’t make sense to me, but make sense to others, many of them are trademarked in an effort to protect and monetize and lots of good work is inaccessible to many due to it being published in academic journals. My advice to anyone, be it consultant, researcher or practitioner is to never stop learning and exploring with an open mind. Great management concepts do not emerge overnight. Over time, some ideas lead to others, some impractical tools had some good points that inspired new hybrids, many organizations had the courage to support innovative staff members and consultant promoted prototypes and great things happened.

Then again, we have the option to put blinkers on and follow industry standards, widely recognized methodologies and popular management tools. That is perfectly fine, too. I myself hold a TOGAF certification (Enterprise Architecture) and I am an PRINCE2 certified practitioner (Project Management). That didn’t stop me to learn about and use components of the Zachman Framework, DODAF, FEAF (Enterprise Architecture), as well as PMBOK and other hybrid project management concepts. I enjoy exploring and generating my own taxonomies, typologies and conceptual systems.

Earlier this year, Gary Hamel launched a call for Management 2.0 in his blog posts: Inventing Management 2.0 and Improving our capacity to manage. The movement is already gaining traction at: The Management Innovation eXchange (MIX) and is supported by academic institutions (i.e London Business School), Industry Organizations (i.e. Dell, National Australia Bank) and research drive consulting companies (i.e. McKinsey&Company and Gartner). In my opinion, such a triumvirate is essential for progressing administrative science theory and practice.

Gary Hamel’s answer to the above question would probably be: It’s time to reinvent management. You can help.

Aurel Brudan
Performance Architect,
www.smartKPIs.com

Advice on KPI documentation and configuration

Saturday, August 13th, 2011

smartKPIs.com Performance Architect update 44/2011

Configuring KPIs following their selection is represented by the documentation of the complete set of relevant details for each KPI and the activation of KPIs so that data can be reported and analyzed.

  1. Link KPIs upstream with business objectives and downstream with organizational initiatives. KPIs should be connected to organizational objective as they make objectives SMART. Initiatives should be establish to support the achievement of objectives by improving KPI results.
  2. Assign a data custodian responsible for gathering measurement data for the KPI. Data gathering for each KPI requires clarity and ownership. Having a responsible for collecting KPI data is a management approach to ensure accountability with data being available for analysis on time.
  3. Assign a KPI owner responsible for the achievement of the desired results. Each KPI should have a manager allocated as its owner, to ensure responsibility regarding its analysis, results and improvement options.
  4. Avoid tunnel KPI definitions – repeating the KPI name in the definition doesn’t add value. Good practice in working with KPIs requires thorough documentation of what they reprezent. Proper KPI definitions should go beyond repeating the KPI name, by providing a plain English explanation of what the KPI is about.
  5. Categorize KPIs by their reporting status – active = data is tracked, inactive = data not available. Activating KPIs is the process of moving a KPI status from inactive, when the data is not available to active, when data is reported and a clear process is in place for doing so on a regular basis.
  6. Clearly identify the unit type, most of the time % (percentage), # (number) and $ (dollar value). KPIs being measurable entities, they have an associated unit type. To simplify communication, the symbol should be used instead of the word expressing it.
  7. Data accuracy for each KPI should be evaluated as low, medium and high and treated as such. Not all KPIs have the same data reliability. Survey based KPIs are always going to be less reliable compared to revenue KPIs, due to objectivity issues. Other aspects to be considered are data automation and auditing.
  8. Determine the frequency of data generation and the frequency of reporting for each KPI. Data for some KPIs, such as ‘# Website visits‘ can be easily gathered on a daily basis. For other KPIs, such as ‘% Employee engagement‘, data gathering requires considerable costs and efforts, impacting a large number of staff. The frequency of reporting is influence by factors such as cost, efforts and technical complexity.
  9. Develop a customized KPI documentation form that contains the relevant details describing the KPI. Documenting KPIs can be easily done in a template that structures the main description fields considered relevant for the organization. smartKPIs.com contains such a model that can be customized at organizational level.
  10. Document if the trend is good when increasing, decreasing or when data is within a range. For some KPIs the results are good when they are decreasing from a period to another – for example ‘# Customer complaints’. For others, such as ‘$ Revenues‘, the results are good when increasing, while in the case of ‘% Budget variance‘, the results are good when within a specific range.
  11. Document where the reporting data for each KPI is sourced from and who produces it. Understanding a KPI relies on having a clear understanding of the data behind it and its source.
  12. Don’t worry too much about a KPI being leading or lagging. Differentiating between the two is debatable and confusing. What is considered a leading KPI for some is a lagging KPI for others. As agreement around this differentiation is oftentimes difficult to achieve, it is secondary in importance and impact.
  13. Ensure each KPI is clearly explained in a definition and has a purpose for usage. The separation between definition and purpose is essential. The purpose expresses the reason for using the KPI and is one of the key components of the documentation form.
  14. KISS – keep it short and simple: Use the # and % symbol to replace “number” and “percentage” in KPI names. Standardizing KPI names and shortening them supports communication and enables clear data visualization of KPIs in dashboard and scorecards.
  15. Simplify KPI names by eliminating the word “of”. As a “common denominator” it can be cut from the name. KPIs are analytical in nature and where possible, their names should be as concise as possible. Definitions, calculation and purpose fields provide context and can be more wordy.

Aurel Brudan
Performance Architect,
www.smartKPIs.com

New smartKPIs.com Report Ranks the Top Healthcare KPIs of 2010

Friday, August 12th, 2011

August 12, 2011, Melbourne, Australia – smartKPIs.com, the world’s largest source of thoroughly documented Key Performance Indicator (KPI) examples announces that “Diagnosis and Treatment” and “Workload and Productivity” KPIs dominate the “Top 25 Healthcare KPIs of 2010”. The report presents in detail KPIs such as: “% Hospital bed occupancy rate”, “# Average daily census” and “# Hospital-acquired infections”, among other KPI examples reviewed by the smartKPIs.com research team. “Top KPIs of 2010″ is a collection of research reports discussing the most popular KPIs of 2010 across functional areas and industries. smartKPIs.com is an expert in the field of performance management and measurement, researching the use of KPI based performance management systems in practice around the world.

The “Top 25 Healthcare KPIs of 2010” report provides insights in the state of Healthcare performance measurement today by listing and analyzing the most visited KPIs on smartKPIs.com in 2010. It is part of theTop KPIs of 2010series of reports and a result of the research program conducted by the analysts of smartKPIs.com in the area of integrated performance management and measurement. smartKPIs.com hosts the largest catalogue of thoroughly documented KPI examples available today and representing an excellent platform for research and dissemination of insights on KPIs and related topics. The hundreds of thousands of visits to smartKPIs.com and the thousands of KPIs visited, bookmarked and rated by members of this online community in 2010 provided a rich data set, which combined with further analysis from the editorial team, formed the basis of these research reports.

(more…)

10 KPIs to Measure Your Social Media ROI

Tuesday, August 9th, 2011

Photo source: http://somnulescu.com

Fact: businesses are concerned to measure their success in social media. The question is how they can do it.  So, how important is to have hundreds or thousands of “likes” if these “likes” fail to engage beyond their initial subscription? So, social media ROI should be based on “interaction and engagement” as primary goal, could be increase sales, share of voice, brand sentiment and many other things but, it’s also important to measure, monitor and compare with other investments in order to be sure that your money is spent wisely.

(more…)

Advice on KPI selection

Saturday, August 6th, 2011

smartKPIs.com Performance Architect update 43/2011

Selecting KPIs is a process which seems simple, yet is inherently complex, due to the interdependencies involved. Here are 15 things to consider before embarking on this journey.

  1. Review existing internal reports and support documents at the beginning of the KPI selection exercise. These may include previous business / strategy plans, annual reports, performance reports and other documentation that relates to performance management, measurement and benchmarking.
  2. Use external lists of examples and other secondary documentation to inform and support KPI selection. It is always a good idea to begin a journey having the end in mind. Reviewing KPI examples used in the industry or functional area, by competitors or other organizations provides context around what is in used in practice by others and improves understanding around the desired output.
  3. Engage internal stakeholders in the process of KPI selection through interactive workshops. KPI selection is not a desk exercise. It is an opportunity to communicate and learn, hence an open discussion in a workshop format is a better approach for enabling not only KPI selection, but also understanding and ownership. 
  4. Calibrate KPI selection around business objectives and value drivers. KPIs are not used in isolation. They are just one component of the value creation chain and of the performance management system. A simple way to position them is al links between business objectives and related organizational initiatives.
  5. Select KPIs based on the realities of organizational activity and environment. Each organization is different, operating in different environments, with different guiding principles. Hence the KPIs used need to reflect the specifics of each organization first and industry/functional area characteristics second.
  6. Maintain a centralized catalogue of KPIs for the entire organization. Structuring KPI documentation in a central repository facilitates their understanding and usage in a similar way across the organization, growing the know-how and facilitating KPI selection and usage on an ongoing basis.
  7. Understand the difference between input, process, output and outcome KPIs. This value creation sequence is essential in facilitating the understanding of KPIs in the context of the value added by the process/activity they are related to. It is an essential mapping technique that facilitates KPI selection.
  8. Don’t hesitate in changing KPIs in scorecards and dashboards. KPIs should reflect activity and activity should adapt to a changing environment. The use of KPIs should be fluid and flexible, reflecting the change in business priorities as a result of the change in the operating environment.
  9. Review KPI relevance regularly. If new KPIs are required, they can be established at any time. An essential aspect of double loop learning. Using KPIs is not only about achieving set targets and objectives, but also about ensuring the objectives and targets were the right ones to be set in the first place and the KPIs used to track their achievement were the appropriate ones.
  10. KPI selection and target setting should be done in accordance with organizational maturity and direction. There is no one size fits all approach when it comes to using KPIs. As strategies vary from one organization to another, the use of KPIs also varies.
  11. Project milestones are not KPIs. Understanding the difference between what is and what is not a KPI is a prerequisite of successful KPI selection.
  12. Targets are not KPIs. Understanding the anatomy of a KPI is essential in KPI selection and usage.
  13. Some things are not worth measuring. For example measuring love might not be such a good idea. Not everything that can be measured should be measured with KPIs.
  14. Some things are too difficult to measure. For example cuteness. The “measuring everything that moves’ mentality should be avoided.
  15. Eliminate or replace inactive KPIs with simpler, yet measurable ones. Using some KPIs may have seemed a good idea at the time of their selection, however if measuring them proves to be too costly or time consuming, they should be replaced. An active KPI is better than an inactive KPI.

Aurel Brudan
Performance Architect,
www.smartKPIs.com

Over 6600 Key Performance Indicator (KPI) examples on www.smartKPIs.com

Friday, August 5th, 2011

Registered members of the www.smartKPIs.com community can now select their Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) from over 6600 performance measures documented and published in the online repository. The smartKPIs.com research team focused over the last few days on publishing examples from the Supply Chain, Procurement, Sales & Customer Service, Information Technology and Human Resources functional areas. Examples from the Education & Training, Professional Services and Healthcare industries were also added.

The functional areas with the highest number of KPI examples are:

The industries with the highest number of documented performance measures are:

Example of a documented performance indicator: % Unscheduled absence breakdown.

smartKPIs Premium

The gold standard‘ in KPI documentation is now available on smartkpis.com. At the core of smartKPIs Premium is a set of over 1,200 KPI examples preselected by the eab group’s research team as the most relevant for practice across functional areas and industries. These were thoroughly documented in over 30 fields, 3 times more than the standard used for most other KPIs.

Example of a performance measure that was documented for smartKPIs Premium section: # National examination score.

Registered member experience on http://www.smartKPIs.com

  • Learn: To learn more about performance management and Key Performance Management visit the Resources section.
  • Explore: To explore the library of KPI examples by navigating the functional area and industry directory, visit the Browse KPIs section.
  • Customize: To build your customized KPI library by saving favorite examples for later use, visit the My KPIs section.
  • Contribute: To propose a new example of KPI, visit the Submit KPIs section.
  • Collaborate: To collaborate with other users and to discuss KPI examples, add comments on each KPI description page, ask questions on smartKPIs Answers, or contribute to the smartKPIs Forum.
registered members

New smartKPIs.com Report Ranks the Top Retail KPIs of 2010

Wednesday, August 3rd, 2011

August 4, 2011, Melbourne, Australia – smartKPIs.com, the world’s largest source of thoroughly documented Key Performance Indicator (KPI) examples announces that Sales Performance and Sales Management dominate the “Top 25 Retail KPIs of 2010”. The report presents in detail KPIs such as: “# Inventory to sales ratio (ISR)”, “% Same store sales growth” and “$ Sales per unit area”, among other KPI examples reviewed by the smartKPIs.com research team. “Top KPIs of 2010″ is a collection of research reports discussing the most popular KPIs of 2010 across functional areas and industries. smartKPIs.com is an expert in the field of performance management and measurement, researching the use of KPI based performance management systems in practice around the world.

The “Top 25 Retail KPIs of 2010” report provides insights in the state of Retail performance measurement today by listing and analyzing the most visited KPIs on smartKPIs.com in 2010. It is part of theTop KPIs of 2010series of reports and a result of the research program conducted by the analysts of smartKPIs.com in the area of integrated performance management and measurement. smartKPIs.com hosts the largest catalogue of thoroughly documented KPI examples available today and representing an excellent platform for research and dissemination of insights on KPIs and related topics. The hundreds of thousands of visits to smartKPIs.com and the thousands of KPIs visited, bookmarked and rated by members of this online community in 2010 provided a rich data set, which combined with further analysis from the editorial team, formed the basis of these research reports. (more…)

On measuring the performance of the Marketing department

Wednesday, July 20th, 2011

Source: Global Growth - jscreationzs

A performance report becomes functional by using KPIs that illustrate the business context and by which action can be identified or labeled worth trying.

When choosing a KPI it should fulfill one of the following categories (Shevlin, 2007):

  • To have the ability to explain. Do your KPIs help explaining why something has happened?
  • To be predictable. Can a KPI predict what will happen in the future within the company?
  • Behaviour change. The measurement of a KPI makes people to act or to behave in a particular way?

Some of the widely used KPIs for measuring marketing department’s performance are (smartKPIs.com, 2011):

  1. % Brand awareness Measures the rate at which target customers recognize and recall the brand.
  2. % Customer retention -  Measures the organization’s ability to create repeat business among its customer base. High retention indicates customer satisfaction is strong.
  3. $ Customer acquisition cost -  Measures how much it costs, in average, to acquire a new customer.
  4. % Customer attrition -  Measures the rate at which the customers stop purchasing the company’s products.
  5. % Repeat customers - Measures the percentage of customers with repeat purchase behavior, from all customers. (more…)

Featured products

$289 USD
 
$183 USD
 
$99 USD
 
$45 USD
 
$35 USD
 
$1800 USD
 
$99 USD
 
$99 USD