Archive for June, 2010

The financial performance of world’s top football clubs – a “Deloitte Football Money League” special report

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

Deloitte Football Money League reached its 13th edition, once with the launch of its latest report on March 2010, under a striking headline: “Spanish Masters Football Money League”.

The report, profiles the highest earning clubs of the world’s most popular sport, football, and was released nine months after the end of the 2008/2009 season.

The measure chosen for assessing the clubs performance is $ Club revenue, as it offers according with Deloitte analysts “the best publicly available financial comparison”. Other measures such as # Fan base, # Broadcast audience, or # On pitch success, though good candidates for assessing club strength and performance, were not considered for the purpose of the current investigation.

Source: Deloitte, 2010

Thus, according with the latest club financial performance results, Real Madrid is the first sports team to record revenues in excess of 400 million Euros in a financial year. What strikes out is the fact that this astronomic revenue was generated in the conditions of a relatively disappointing season, with poor performance results for the team, both in the internal arena, where they were overpowered by their life time rivals, F.C. Barcelona, but also on the international stage, where they suffered a six consecutive loss in a Champions League knock out stage. Despite all these misfortunes the matchday, broadcasting and commercial revenues, where all in triple figures at the end of the reporting period, maximizing club’s revenues.

Source: Deloitte, 2010

Even more impressive, the report reveals that the revenues of the Spanish top 2 clubs, Real Madrid and Barcelona, have tripled in the last 10 years as the graph below shows. This is mostly due to a tremendous increase in the revenues generated from broadcasting rights. Thus, the two clubs significantly ascended in the Deloitte Money League Rankings, Real Madrid from the 6th position up on the top spot and Barcelona from the 13th position on the 3rd place.

Revenue growth of selected Money League clubs 2000/01 to 2008/09  (Euros/millions)

Source: Deloitte, 2010

As the report further reveals, the top 20 of the world’s most successful football clubs is entirely dominated by major European clubs. Most of them, as regular participants in the richest football clubs competition, the  UEFA Champions League, are also generating impressive revenues from it, both from the tickets sales and TV broadcasting rights but also from the match-day prize money. According with Deloitte analysts, the revenues generated by the most prestigious European football clubs competition over the last 18 years increased more than twenty fold, from 45 million Euros in 1992/93 season to a staggering 1, 090 billion Euros in 2009/10 season.

Source: Deloitte, 2010

These figures, are further proof that  football has become indeed a major industry. Club performance is no longer measured only by the form showed on the pitch by teams during competitions, but  is becoming more and more dependent on the clubs leaders ability to manage “a real business”, one in witch marketing campaigns are as important as football transfers, and leadership over the entire club is as important as the leadership that the football team captain has to show on the pitch.

For more Sport Management KPIs visit: http://www.smartkpis.com/kpi/industries/sport-management/

References:

Performance in tennis – the longest marathon match in the history of tennis

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

A few days ago at Wimbledon, the third grand slam of the year hosted what became the longest match in the history of official tennis competitions. The protagonists, John Isner and Nicolas Mahut have dueled during three consecutive days in what was to become an epic battle, which probably will remain forever in the Wimbledon annals of tennis and not only. The match established several staggering records:

Match duration: 11 hours, 5 minutes

Fifth set duration: 8 hours, 11 minutes

Total number of games: 183

Fifth set number of games: 138

Total games during which serve was held: 169

Total number of points: 980

Combined aces served: 215 (112/103)

Total winners: 490 (246/244)

For a full statistics analysis you can visualize the scoreboard below:

Source: Wimbledon tournament website, 2010

Additionally, smartkpis.com contains a complete library of KPI examples from tennis, which can be accessed online on the Sport KPI examples sections of the site. Recently a set of five new metrics relating to the chair umpire decisions challenging system, named Hawk Eye were introduced. These are:

# Total Challenges

# Correct challenges

# Incorrect challenges

% Overturned

# Average challenges per match

References:

Wimbledon Championships Website 2010, Isner finally triumphs in longest-ever match, available at http://www.wimbledon.org/en_GB/news/match_reports/2010-06-24/201006241277372652221.html?promo=sl_toparticles, (accessed 25 June 2010)

Wimbledon Championships Website 2010, Player Challenge System, available at http://www.wimbledon.org/en_GB/scores/challenge/index.html, (accessed 25 June 2010)

Wimbledon Championships Website 2010, Match Statistics, available at http://www.wimbledon.org/en_GB/scores/stats/day11/1160ms.html, (accessed 25 June 2010)

Enhancing business performance with intelligent data visualization – Ideas from sport

Monday, June 28th, 2010

Data presentation and visualization solutions have increased in popularity in the recent years. Tremendous advancements in information technology and the wide adoption of the internet had a positive effect on communication, data interchange and visualization across networks, business and social communities.

Driven by the business need of analyzing large volumes of data and presenting them in a concentrated, transparent and easy to read form, data visualization instruments such as dashboard solutions register nowadays an increased level of adoption in several activity fields.

Sport is one of them, and particularly those competitions with a large following all over the world, such as football, basketball, tennis, cricket, baseball or golf. These sports are benefiting from a wide variety of data presentations and visualization applications which enable a closer and easier connections with fans.

Only in the last month, once with the start off the World Cup South Africa 2010 a variety of presentation and visualization solutions were launched, slicing and dicing all competition details and data. An excellent visualization solution is presented by Marca.com:

Source: Marca.com, 2010

What is interesting though, is that what we are witnessing today in the data visualization field  is sort of an “echolocation effect”: ideas bounce back from business to sports and business again.  Such complex data visualization applications, as the one presented in the image above, which were first inspired from business visualization and representation solutions can be used now back as sources of inspirations for a more creative business data visualization solutions.

References:

Marca.com (2010), World Cup South Africa 2010 interactive calendar, available at http://www.marca.com/deporte/futbol/mundial/sudafrica-2010/calendario-english.html, (accessed 25 June 2010)

Mission statements as strategic management tools – A brief history

Saturday, June 26th, 2010

smartKPIs.com Performance Architect update 25/2010

The pursuit of organizational clarity and alignment towards a strategic direction has preoccupied researchers and practitioners for many decades. Especially over the last 50 years, a variety of management concepts have been popularized and adopted by organizations with more or less success.

Two such management concepts that gained popularity since then are mission and vision statements. They are considered strategic management tools or instruments, one of the clearest definitions for both being: “The mission statement is a statement of a company’s purpose,…, if mission outlines what the company is attempting to achieve at the present time, its vision offers a view of what the enterprise might become.” (Grant 2002: 60).

The term “mission” is reported to have been used first by Jesuit monks, to depict the act of sending monks on overseas missions, such as the missions in the 16th century in South America, following the landing of Christopher Columbus (Merino and Newson 1995). Over time, the use of the term expanded from religion to the military, who used it to reflect a specific assignment allocated as part of a plan or strategy. The link between military and business vocabulary was facilitated by books such as “On War” by Carl von Clausewitz (1832), considered one of the most important treaties on the philosophy of war. An entire section of the book (“Of strategy in general”) was dedicated to strategy and is considered today an important precursor of strategy management literature.

One of the earliest uses of a mission statement outside of religious and military organizations is reported to have occurred in 1941, when the American Journal of Economics and Sociology was established by Adolph Lowe and Franz Oppenheimer. As founding members of the editorial board they adopted a mission statement for the journal that called for cooperation and constructive synthesis in social sciences (Forstater 2002).

In business context, the use of the term mission had a different path. As early as 1960, Stoller and Van Horn wrote about how the military approach to planning can be applied in a business context. Smalter (1964) published one of the first articles exploring the influence of military literature on management practice. It explored in detail how the military concept of missions can be applied in business, however the term was used more in a “program-package” sense and not in the sense it is widely used today. Tombach (1961:54) had a different approach to using the word “mission” to cross-over from military to business literature: “the mission of defense […] can be broadly defined as that of preventing or minimizing damage to a target or target complex […] from hostile action.”

According to David (1989), the link to the business environment was facilitated by Peter Drucker, who started to write on the topic in mid 1970s. One of Drucker’s recommended questions for any organization was: “What is our business?”. David (1989:90) considered the answer is reflected in Drucker’s own words (1973): “A business is not defined by its name, statutes, or articles of incorporation. It is defined by the business mission. Only a clear definition of the mission and purpose of the organization makes possible clear and realistic business objectives.”

McGinnis (1981), Pearce II (1982), Staples and Black (1984) were among the first to dedicate entire articles to the discussion of the use of missions statements as strategic management tools. The term “mission statement” was understood as expressing the fundamental purpose specific to an organisation.

By 1986, two things occurred. On one hand, mission statements became widely used in corporate environments. Want (1986:48) notes that: “Executives and consultants alike are familiar with mission statements, and many have participated in the mission-writing exercise.” On the other hand, divergent views how mission statements should be formulated and used started to emerge. Pearce II and David (1987) proposed eight key components, among which mentions of target customers and markets, identification of products and services, geographic domain, core technologies and desired public image. Want (1986) lists as primary components of corporate mission statements: purpose, principle business aims, corporate identity, policies of the company and the values.

Regardless of these challenges, by 1990s research on the use of mission statements started to focus on their use (Ireland and Hitt 1992), their role (Leuthesser and Kohli 1997) and impact on firm performance (Bart and Baetz 1998). From 2000 onwards, researchers focused increasingly on questioning the value added by mission statements. Titles such as “Mission Statements: Are They Smoke and Mirrors?” (Bartkus, Glassman and McAfee 2000) and “Mission Possible: Do School Mission Statements Work?” (Davis, Ruhe, Lee, Rajadhyaksha 2007) are illustrative. Further research in the impact of mission statements on the financial performance concluded that they have little or no impact on financial performance (Bartkus, Glassman and McAfee 2006).

One of the most comprehensive reviews of the topic by Stallworth Williams (2008) concluded that despite the challenges in the formulation and use of mission statements, they shouldn’t be considered fads, as they withstood the test of time and continue to matter.

Mission statements continue to remain an important strategic management and business performance management tool, helping with grounding organisations by clarifying their purpose or reason to exist and framing the context of their operations.

Stay smart! Enjoy smartKPIs.com!

Aurel Brudan

Performance Architect,
www.smartKPIs.com


References

Bart C, Baetz M (1998) The relationship between mission statements and firm performance: An exploratory study, Journal of Management Studies, 35(6): 823-853.

Bartkus B, Glassman M and McAfee B (2000), Mission Statements: Are They Smoke and Mirrors? Business Horizons, November-December: 23-28.

Bartkus B, Glassman M and McAfee B (2006), Mission Statement Quality and Financial Performance, European Management Journal, 24(1): 86–94.

David F. (1989) How Companies Define Their Mission, Long Range Planning, 22(1): 90-97.

Davis JH, Ruhe JA, Lee M, Rajadhyaksha U (2007), Mission Possible: Do School Mission Statements Work?, Journal of Business Ethics, 70:99–110.

Forstater M (2002) How the AJES Got its Mission Statement in 1941, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61(4):779-786.

Grant RM (2002) Contemporary Strategy Analysis, 4th edition, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK.

Ireland RD and Hitt MA (1992) Mission Statements: Importance, Challenge, and Recommendations for Development, Business Horizons, May-June: 34-42.

Leuthesser L and Kohli C (1997) Corporate Identity: The Role Of Mission Statements, Business Horizons, May-June: 34-42.

McGinnis VJ (1981), The mission statement: A key step in strategic planning, Business, November December: 39-43.

Merino O, Newson LA (1995) ‘Jesuit Missions in Spanish America: The Aftermath of the Expulsion’. Paper presented at the Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers, accessed at http://sites.maxwell.syr.edu/CLAG/yearbook1995/newson.pdf on 29 June 2010.

Pearce II JA (1982), The Company Mission as a Strategic Goal, Sloan Management Review, Spring: 15-24.

Pearce II JA, David F (1987) Corporate Mission Statements: The Bottom Line, The Academy of Management Executive, 1(2):109- 115.

Smalter DJ (1964) The Influence of Department of Defense Practices on Corporate Planning, Management Technology, 4(2):115-138.

Stallworth Williams L (2008), The Mission Statement – A Corporate Reporting Tool With a Past, Present, Future, Journal of Business Communication, 45( 2): 94-119.

Staples WA, Black KU (1984) Defining Your Business Mission: A Strategic Perspective, Journal of Business Strategies, 1:33-39.

Stoller DS, Van Horn RL (1960) Design of a Management Information System, Management Technology, 1(1):86-91.

Tombach H (1961) Critique of Air Defense Measures of Effectiveness, Management Technology, 1(3):52-62.

Von Clausenwitz C (1832) On War, 1st edition in English (1874) translated by Colonel J.J. Graham, accessed at http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/1946 on 28 June 2010.

Want JH (1986) Corporate mission, Management Review, August: 46–50.

Walker, Rob 1992, Rank Xerox – Management Revolution”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 9 to 21

Indicators Measuring the Equity of European Educational Systems

Friday, June 25th, 2010

Equity of the European Educational Systems. A Set of Indicators is a project that attempted to demonstrate the feasibility of building a set of indicators regarding the equity of education. The publication reports on a two-year period work on the issue of the equity of educational systems and covers three main parts:

  • The concepts of equality and equity, and the framework of indicators and its guiding principles.
  • A set of twenty-nine indicators on the equity of the educational systems, built in the context of this project and organized according to the framework.
  • An interpretation of the 29 indicators in an analytical interpretation of the equity indicators.

The European Group of Research on Equity of the Education Systems (GERESE) has been constituted in 2001 for developing a set of indicators for measuring the equity of education systems in the European Union Member States. The final report presents the 29 indicators developed as an informative tool to support decision-makers to redefine the educational politics.

The matrix of indicators

The matrix of indicators (GERESE, 2005)

The indicators presented are intended to provide input to the debate on justice in education, by offering some elements of response to the following questions:

  • What are the causes and the consequences of the individual educational inequalities ?
  • What is the importance of educational inequalities between girls and boys or between groups of different social, economic or national origins ? To what extent are they due to the societal context or rather due to the process of the educational system ?
  • How being below a minimum skill threshold can have important consequences for the individuals in and outside the school context ?

An approach to the fairness of European education systems

An approach to the fairness of European education systems (GERESE, 2005)

The table above shows that in some education systems, the inequalities in education are homogeneous, being pronounced (Germany and to a lesser extent Belgium) or small (Finland, Sweden, and to a less marked extent, Spain and Ireland) according to the three criteria at the same time:

  • inequalities between individuals (2)
  • inequalities between groups (3 and 4)
  • proportion below the threshold (5).

The two main overall conclusions stated in the report and emerged from this analysis:

  1. Education systems have clear differences in equity. The data does not confirm the premise according to which inequalities are low in countries where education has few external rewards.
  2. Some education systems that seem more (or less) fair than others on a large majority of the criteria, but for many the judgement of their fairness varies, sometimes considerably, depending on how we read the data. This study opted for a comparative and distinctive approach, pursuing a single principle of equity in the labyrinth of indicators, comparing equity, effectiveness and efficiency. (GERESE 2005)

References:

European Group of Research on Equity of the Education Systems (GERESE) 2005, Equity of the European Educational Systems. A Set of Indicators, available at http://www.okm.gov.hu/download.php?ctag=download&docID=296 (accessed 10 June 2010)

Performance measures for the global newspaper publishing market

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

The report The evolution of news and the Internet, recently launched by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), provides a thorough analysis of the global newspaper market and its evolution. It explores its economics, the development of online news, related opportunities and challenges and policy approaches.

According to the statistics presented within the report, the newspaper publishing industry faces declining advertising revenues, titles and circulation, this downward being amplified also by the economic crisis.  Newspaper readership faced decline in 20 out of 30 OECD countries, numbers being usually lower among younger people who tend to attribute less importance to print media. The revenues of the global newspaper publishing market derives mainly from advertising ( 57%).

Contribution of advertising and copy sales to paid-for daily newspaper revenues
in per cent, 2008 or latest year available (OECD 2010)

Online news are highly popular in some OECD countries (up to 77 per cent in Korea), but the willingness to pay for online news remains low. While younger age groups are much more active online news readers, it is usually slightly older groups — 25-34 year-olds – who are most active in most OECD countries. About 5% of all Internet visits are related to reading news online, which is a conservative estimate. (OECD 2010)

Proportion of individuals reading/downloading online newspapers/news magazines over the
Internet for private purposes (OECD 2010)

The internet is rapidly replacing the conventional news media, as for example in Korea, where it has long overpowered all other forms of communication, especially the offline newspaper  (OECD 2010).

The performance measures used within the report for the global newspaper market are:

Online newspapers:

Printed newspaper:

For further examples of performance indicators, explore the Publishing KPI examples and  Online Presence – eCommerce KPI examples sections of the library of KPI examples available on smartkpis.com (smartKPIs.com, 2010).

References:

OECD 2010, The evolution of news and the Internet, available at http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2009doc.nsf/LinkTo/NT00009C92/$FILE/JT03285390.PDF (accessed 20 June 2010).

smartKPIs.com (2010), Publishing KPI examples, available at http://www.smartkpis.com/kpi/industries/publishing/ (accessed 7 June 2010).

smartKPIs.com (2010), Online Presence -eCommerce examples, available at http://www.smartkpis.com/kpi/functional-areas/online-presence-ecommerce/ (accessed 7 June 2010).

World Cup 2010 and social media performance – England goalkeeper Robert Green’s mistake attracts social media attention!

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

A shocking error from the England’s goalkeeper Robert Green, earned the U.S.A. squad a 1-1 draw in the first match of the South Africa World Cup 2010 group stage.

The goalkeeper blunder, as outlined by one of the latest Nielsen (2010) analysis, triggered unexpected levels of reactions in the social media from England and USA, but with however contrasting effect in the overall buzz level changes from the two countries.

The analysis outlines the share of online buzz, in English language social media talks surrounding U.S and English national team players related to the 2010 World Cup squads. (Nielsen Wire, 2010)

The analysis is based on two performance indicators:

• % Player buzz in the social media

• % Change in overall buzz levels

USA and England Soccer Player Buzz Rankings, at  14 June 2010

Source: Nielsen Wire, 2010

As the Nielsen analysis  outlines, two major reactions were registered in the social media talks after the England vs. USA game from the World Cup 2010, both having english goalkeeper Robert Green’s stunning mistake as a trigger point.

On the one hand, the mistake, who upset almost 50 million English fans, pulled the goalkeeper out from obscurity in the social media spotlight (Nielsen Wire, 2010). Newspaper titles such as “hand of clod”, “cock –up keeper Green wrecks dream start” “tainted glove” or “worst howler ever”, triggered a storm of discussions on social media forums that earned Robert Green an 11.4 % buzz share and the first spot in the Nielsen rankings ahead of more famous team mate Wayne Rooney.

On the other hand, this unfortunate and costly mistake for the England soccer team produced a 21 % drop in the overall social media discussions around the squad, reflecting the general disappointment of the English nation. In stark contrast, same mistake  produced a 250% increase in the social media discussions round the USA team, as the Nielsen analyst suggest.

Overall, it appears that a simple mistake from a goalkeeper has the power to ignite, through social media channels, the hearts and minds of USA fans, bringing this sport into spotlight in a country where baseball, ice hockey , american football or basketball are the major sport attractions.

References:

Additional resources:

Econometrics and the most significant World Cup performance value drivers

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

In two previous blog posts we have presented different methodologies incorporating a variety of correlations, constructed by consultants from Goldman Sachs and J.P Morgan to determine the most probable winners of the World Cup 2010.

Today we will bring to your attention a third perspective, an econometric model adapted by PricewaterhouseCoopers consultants for analyzing the most influential drivers of World Cup performance and determine which are the most likely national teams to win this year’s World Cup edition.

For calculating the econometric model 2 broader measures for national performance in football were taken into consideration:

Total World Cup Points ever gained at a final tournament, where one victory counts for 3 points and a draw for 1

Total FIFA World Ranking points

Source: PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2010

These 2 main measures were than separately correlated in the econometric model developed with what were considered to be three of the most important external drivers of world cup performance.

• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita

• Population size

• Host country advantage

The results of the econometric analysis showed out that while population size and gross domestic product are statistically insignificant for determining the most probable winners of the World Cup, the two constants from the model, the historic World Cup performance and the FIFA world ranking together with the host country advantage driver demonstrated to be the most important factors that count for determining the World Cup winners.

More than that, the advantage of the host country seems to have a highly significant positive effect in determining the teams who will have good performance at the World Cup. Host crowd support and familiar climate conditions are probably two significant factors in that respect.

As the table below shows, only the Spanish team outperformed at the 1982 World Cups, the hosts of the other World Cup editions having decent, if not even brilliant performances. Thus, countries such as Ghana, Nigeria or South Africa are likely to have good performances at the World Cup 2010 edition, even though it is hardly believable that they will be able to win the tournament.

Source: PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2010

Finally, according with the three most important drivers or determinants of World Cup performance, as showed by the PricewaterhouseCoopers econometric model, Brazil is the most likely team to win the World Cup. It is ranked on the first place both in the Historical World Cup performance ranking and in the FIFA World rankings and is the only team who has ever won a world cup title outside of its own continent.

References:

Additional resources:

World Cup South Africa 2010 – most buzzed players in the social media

Monday, June 21st, 2010

As one of the latest Nielsen (2010) studies related to World Cup 2010 reveal, the most buzzed player in the social media is the Ivory Coast striker and star player Didier Drogba (3.40%). He is followed quite at a long distance by the Netherlands star Arjen Robben (1.60%), with Argentinean and world best player in 2009, Lionel Messi on the third spot (1.40%), and Portuguese playmaker Cristiano Ronaldo on the fourth position only (1.10%).

The study was conducted in the week previous to the start of the South Africa World Cup 2010 and looked at all World Cup related messages on blogs, message boards, groups, videos and image sites including You Tube, Facebook or Twitter – that mentioned at least one of 345 leading players related to the squads that qualified for the World Cup 2010 (Nielsen Wire, 2010).

The indicator that was used to measure this analysis results was: % Selected player Buzz in the social media

Source: Nielsen Wire, 2010

What is striking, is that most of the pre World-Cup player social media buzz was dominated by player injuries talk, while names such as those of the world football stars Wayne Rooney, Cristiano Ronaldo or Lionel Messi caught up frontline positions only due to the players leading roles in the Nike and Pepsi advertising campaigns, about which we talked in a previous blog post: South Africa 2010 FIFA World Cup Social media fever – the most viewed ads on YouTube.

References:

Additional resources:

Castrol Index and the World Cup South Africa 2010

Saturday, June 19th, 2010

In a previous blog post “Performance in sport: a new era has began” we reviewed the ascent of sport in popular culture, bringing together entertainment, business and healthcare. Football in particular became in the last two decades a veritable industry that started to attract increased attention from analysts and media.

The Castrol Index and Ranking System is the world’s first ranking program based on the actual performance of football players. Using the latest technology to objectively analyze each player’s performance on the pitch, the Castrol Index tracks every move of each player during a game and assess whether it has a positive or negative impact on a team’s ability to score or concede a goal. In doing so, an index of more than 20 performance measures, such as: assists, blocked shot, duels won, minutes played, passing accuracy or shots on target are used.

Being an official partner of the  World Cup South Africa 2010, Castrol through Castrol Football have recently launched a  several new features that were added to the old Ranking System. Fans from all over the world are able now to assess the performance of their favorite players and teams present at the World Cup.

Source: Castrol Football, 2010

Additionally, FIFA World Cup Predictor functionality allows fans to visualize each team’s chances of progression through the tournament, providing with insights into how a particularly team will fare in the group, who they will face in the knock out stages and ultimately their chance to win the World Cup.

To give an example we have choose England as a case study for a complete presentation of the FIFA World Cup Predictor  main features or characteristics. However, while being into the online application you can view predictions for any of the 32 participating teams at the World Cup 2010.

1. Success Predictor: How far is your team likely to progress in the 2010 World Cup?

Source: Castrol Football, 2010

2. Group Predictor: How will your team perform in their group?

Source: Castrol Football, 2010

3. Match Predictor: What are your team’s chance of beating its World Cup rivals?

Source: Castrol Football, 2010

4. Opponent Predictor: Who is your team most likely to play with  in the knockout stages?

Source: Castrol Football, 2010

5. Tournament Predictor: Which teams are likely to progress to the later stages and who will they play with?

Source: Castrol Football, 2010

6. World Cup 2010 Winner Predictor: Who is most likely to win the 2010 World Cup?

Source: Castrol Football, 2010

The Castrol Index and Ranking System makes football performance measurement easier. Debates such as who is a better player or which team payed better now have an analytical based answer…In the new edition of the Castrol blog post series we will present a new feature of the Index, which is about to be released soon, by Castrol Football, during the knock out stages of the World Cup 2010: the Castrol Edge Penalty Analysis!

References:

Additional resources:

Benchmarking, Rank Xerox and Canon

Friday, June 18th, 2010

smartKPIs.com Performance Architect update 24/2010

Benchmarking as a management concept is reported to have its roots in land surveying, where the altitude of objects is estimated based on a pre-established point of reference on an arbitrary landmark (McNary, 1994). Frederick Taylor is reported to be the first to use benchmarking along with other principles in a business enterprise to improve performance. Elements of benchmarking can be recognized in Taylor’s scientific management approach applied during his time at Bethlehem Steel Company (McNary, 1994), popularized in “The Principles of Scientific Management” .

Benchmarking as we know it today was first applied by the Xerox Corporation in later 70s, early 80s. Faced with increased competition from Japanese imports, Xerox set upon improve its order fulfillment process and other processes deemed unproductive. One of the first accounts of the “competitive benchmarking” approach at Xerox was given in 1992 by Rob Walker, the Director of Business Management Systems and Quality at Rank Xerox (U.K.) Ltd. at the time. In his article “Rank Xerox – Management Revolution”, he describes in detail the challenges, changes made and impact of the “competitive benchmarking” approach at the company. Under the “competitive benchmarking” initiative. Xerox compared itself to its Japanese competitors as well as large organizations operating outside of the industry: “American Express for billing and collections, American Hospital Supply for automated inventory control, LL Bean for distribution, warehousing and order-taking” (Walker, 1992).

The ascent of benchmarking in the 80s resulted in numerous books and articles published, reflected in the business environment by an increase in the use of benchmarking around the world. Comparing to others is natural to humans, so benchmarking was rather easy to understand in theory. Applying it in practice and generating value from it is a different story.

In sports and tennis in particular, performance metrics are monitored by players and coaches to track progress and how the game plan was executed. In terms of benchmarking KPIs between players, this needs to be explored with care. The playing style is different from one player to another. One player might have a very powerful serve, but generally inaccurate. Another might have a high percentage of net approaches, but ineffective. On top of this, in tennis the concentration power and determination is in many instances more important than game statistics. Similarly, in business, many companies zoom to a different tune. While benchmarking sounds good in theory, there are many practical issues relating to data accuracy and relevance of results. There are many questions organisations need to clarify before embarking on such a road:

a. Who may the beneficiaries of such an exercise be?

b. What is the added value?

c. Who has done this well?

The graph below raises another question:

Source: Google Finance, 2010

Did it ultimately work for Rank Xerox?

or even

What did Canon differently to generate such a gap between the stock price performance over the last 10 years?

Comparing performance across entities is even easier today. Availability of information technology and rich datasets facilitates benchmarking across multiple dimensions. However, embarking on benchmarking initiatives  because “it seems to be a popular tool” or because it was recommended by a consultant can be risky. Same as if it is pursued  “just because we can” or with unreliable data. Done properly, it might still be a good idea overall, but then another question needs to be asked:

Are there any other better ideas?

Yet again, Study puts initiatives management in a new light.

Stay smart! Enjoy smartKPIs.com!

Aurel Brudan

Performance Architect,
www.smartKPIs.com


References

McNary, Lisa D. 1994, “Thinking about excellence and benchmarking”, The Journal for Quality and Participation, July-August 1994, v17, n4, p90(1)

Walker, Rob 1992, “Rank Xerox – Management Revolution”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 9 to 21

Walker, Rob 1992, Rank Xerox – Management Revolution”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 9 to 21

Featured products

$183 USD
 
$99 USD
 
$1800 USD
 
$35 USD
 
$99 USD
 
$45 USD
 
$99 USD
 
$289 USD