Archive for December, 2009

Happy New Year!

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

A Happy New Year to all www.smartKPIs.com visitors!

A new approach to measuring performance in cricket: the Castrol Index

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

Cricket is considered today as one of the major world sports in terms of participants, spectators and media interest. Although it originates from England, cricket did not attract much interest and attention in Europe like football did. However it became hugely popular in countries such as India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, South Africa, Australia, New Zeeland and West Indies, most of them former British colonies or still under the Crown influence.

With an increased influence and interest in the game of cricket around the world, the International Cricket Conference (ICC) is trying to implement new development programs with the goal of producing more national teams capable of competing at Test level but also club teams that can compete in professional leagues at national or international level. Thus, in the last years we could see the development of the shorter versions of the game such as the Twenty 20 World Cup (2007), the official Indian Premier League (2008) and the Cricket Champion League (2009).

Because of its increased popularity and tremendous developments, especially in terms of birth of new professional competitions, cricket became today a major attraction, whose performance in all of its aspects is an important phenomenon to watch and measure. As a result, more applications and programs that monitor performance in cricket have already started to emerge.

One such example is the Castrol Cricket Index which objectively analyses and ranks player and team performance by adopting a comprehensive approach towards the game.

The Castrol Index takes into consideration all aspects of the players’ game such as the battling, bowling and fielding trying to create and bring into attention comprehensive statistics, insights, information and knowledge in order to facilitate a better understanding of the game and what is necessary in order to create a winning performance. It monitors both player and team performances separately, enabling “connoisseurs” to track teams or players performance on a cumulative level or in different aspects of the game.

On the individual level, players are assessed for their both core (battling and bowling) and noncore (fielding and wicket keeping) skills being awarded with base points for core skills and bonus points for noncore skills. At the team level, Castrol Index focuses on team overall battling momentum and bowling efficiency across a set of matches. The most important metrics their performance is assessed against are:

Overall, as Harsha Bhogle, cricket commentator and ambassador for the Castrol Index acknowledges: “The Castrol Index provides differentiated analysis and information that sheds new light on how the game is played and won. The Castrol Index provides unique insights into the performance of players and teams – specifically what makes some of them more effective and successful than others. It provides a point of view based on analysis and data not just subjective opinion”.

For more details about how Castrol Index is calculated please visit: www.castrolcricket.com

The football version of Index is available at: www.castrolfootball.com

References:
www.essortment.com/hobbies/historycricket_sngj.htm
www.yehhaicricket.com/history/history.html
www.castrolcricket.com

Sustainability Product Index – A Walmart initiative

Saturday, December 26th, 2009

One of the important events of 2009 for the Retail industry and Sustainability community was the launch of the Sustainable Product Index initiative by Walmart and the establishment of the Sustainability Consortium.

The Sustainable Product Index is intended to be an open source worldwide standard of measuring the sustainability of a product.

The Sustainability Consortium is an independent group of scientists and engineers from leading academic research institutions around the world who engage with other leading researchers from the NGO, Governmental and Industrial sectors. The primary function is to develop the science to support the indexing of consumer products throughout all phases of the products life.

The initiative was announced by Mike Duke, president and CEO, Walmart at the July 2009 Milestone Meeting.  The 20 minutes video of the address is available below:

Key discussion points:

On measurement

  • Retailer at hart, with engineering training (Alumni of Georgia Tech)
  • I like metrics, I like measurements, I like to set goals and measure results. I guess it comes with that qualitative measurement approach.
  • If you can’t measure it, you can manage it.
  • In some ways we have got measurements already, we think there is a need of much more in this area of measurement.

On customer expectations

Consumers have much higher expectations from retailer and suppliers:

  1. Savings. The Global Financial Crises brought on new expectations from consumers. Customers want to save money even more and they are smart about what and how they are spending.
  2. Transparency. The speed of information is higher. Greated transparency in the future is expected and will accellerate. If businesses are not transparent, they will not have the trust of consumers.
  3. Sustainability. World population is currently 6.7 billion, growing to over 9 billion by 2050 . We are depleating the natural resources of the world if consumer patters will be mantained or accelerate.

On the Product Sustainability Index

A global standard to be used across the world with all retailers, in all countries. Will help raise quality and lower cost, while enabling innovation across the supply chain.

1. Supplier Assessment

A 15 questions questionnaire will be provided to suppliers to evaluate therir approach to sustainability. The questions are dedived into four areas:

  • Energy and Climate
  • Natural resources
  • Material efficiency
  • People and Community

Piloted with the top 50 suppliers from the USA and gradually rolled-out globally to over 100,000 suppliers.

2. Lifecycle Analysis Database

  • Consortium of universities that will collaborate with suppliers, retailers, NGOs and government to develop a global database of information on the lifecycle of products – from raw materials to disposal.
  • Arizona State University and the University of Arkansas will jointly administer the consortium.
  • The company will also partner with one or more leading technology companies to create an open platform that will power the index.\

3. A Simple Tool for Consumers

  • Standard database available to tell customers about the sustainability index of they product they are purchasing.
  • The sustainability consortium will help determine the scoring process in the coming months and years.

Quotes

“The index will bring about a more transparent supply chain, drive product innovation and, ultimately, provide consumers the information they need to assess the sustainability of products. If we work together, we can create a new retail standard for the 21st century.”

Mike Duke, President and Chief Executive Officer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Walmart Sustainability Milestone Meeting, July 16, 2009

“I think from a business perspective there is another opportunity that Since the beginning of modern retailing in the US, there has never been a retail brand that’s transitioned from one generation to the next. This is our opportunity to connect with the next generation. By leading in sustainability and being able to deliver quality products at low prices, to be able to deliver our value proposition, we will connect with these consumers. We may never be cool, but we care and we can make a difference.”

John Fleming, EVP and Chief Merchandising Officer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Walmart Sustainability Milestone Meeting, July 16, 2009

Additional resources:

Retailer at hart, with engineering training (Alumni of Georgia Tech)
I like metrics, I like measurements, I like to set goals and measure results. I guess it comes

with that qualitateive measurement approach.
If you can’t measure it, you can manage it.
In some ways we have got measurements already, we think there is a need of much more in this

area, of measurement.

Consumers have much higher expectations from retailer and suppliers.

1. Savings. The Global Financial Crises brought on new expectations from consumers. Customers

want to save money even more and they are smart about what and how they are spending.
2. Transparency. The speed of information is higher. Greated transparency in the future is

expected and will accellerate. If businesses are not transparent, they will not have the trust

of consumers.
3. Sustainability. World population is currently 6.7 billion, growing to over 9 billion by

2050 . We are depleating the natural resources of the world if consumer patters will me

mantained or accelerate.

Walmart Sustainability Index
A global standard to be used across the world with all retailers, in all countries.
Help raise quality and lower cost.
Create innovation across the supply chain.

1. Supplier Addessment
A 15 questions questionnaire will be provided to suppliers to evaluate therir approach to

sustainability. The questions are dedived into four areas:
Energy and Climate
Natural resources
Material efficiency
People and Community
Piloted with the top 50 suppliers from the USA and gradually rolled-out globally to over

100,000 suppliers.

2. Lifecycle Analysis Database
Consortium of universities that will collaborate with suppliers, retailers, NGOs and

government to develop a global database of information on the lifecycle of products – from raw

materials to disposal.
Arizona State University and the University of Arkansas will jointly administer the

consortium.
The company will also partner with one or more leading technology companies to create an open

platform that will power the index.

3. A Simple Tool for Consumers
Standard database available to tell customers about the sustainability index of they product

they are purchasing.
The sustainability consortium will help determine the scoring process in the coming months and

years.

“I think from a busines sperspective there is another opportunity that Since the beginning of modern retailing in the US, there has never been a retail brand that’s transitioned from one generation to the next. This is our opportunity to connect with the next generation. By leading in sustainability and being able to deliver quality products at low prices, to be able to deliver our value proposition, we will connect with these consumers. We may never be cool, but we care and we can make a difference.”
John Fleming, EVP and Chief Merchandising Officer, July 2009 Milestone Meeting – Sustainability Index

1000 Key Performance Indicators (KPI) examples on smartKPIs.com

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

With 275 Performance Measures published this month, the KPI repository on www.smartKPIs.com grew to over 1000 KPI examples. Registered visitors can build their personalized library of KPIs by selecting them from the well documented KPI examples available on the website.

The functional areas with the highest number of KPI examples are:

Within the industry categories, the highest numbers of documented KPIs are in:

Example of a documented performance measure: % Defects removal efficiency.

User experience on www.smartKPIs.com

  • Learn: To learn more about performance management and Key Performance Management visit the Resources section.
  • Explore: To explore the library of KPI examples by navigating the functional area and industry directory, visit the Browse KPIs section.
  • Customize: To build your customized KPI library by saving favorite examples for later use, visit the My KPIs section.
  • Contribute: To propose a new example of KPI, visit the Submit KPIs section.
  • Collaborate: To collaborate with other users and to discuss KPI examples, add comments on each KPI description page.

Exploring customer profitability

Monday, December 21st, 2009

At macro level, marketing performance appraisals focus on customers as a whole, on how they perceive the brand, what knowledge they have about it, the level of their satisfaction and how they respond to various marketing efforts (advertising, pricing strategies etc.).

Managing customer relationships at micro level can be a very complex process, where performance management looks at improving the administrative aspects that can influence customer satisfaction (such as sound document flows with customers), as well as achieving long term goals (as the customer lifetime value).  The major purpose of customer performance management is to measure and enhance profitable interactions with customers.

smartKPIs.com documented several customer metrics that can be good KPI candidates:

% Customers retained in a given time period

% Customer attrition

% Customer acquisition

$ Spend per customer

$ Average acquisition cost

$ Average retention cost

% Frequent customers

$ Customer profitability

$ Lifetime value of a customer (LTV)

We invite you to explore our database of KPIs for more details on these metrics.

The current blog post aims at providing an in-depth view of customer profitability.

Why is exploring customer profitability important? Because it is vital to differentiate profitable customers from unprofitable ones, in order to either give up on the relationship with the latter ones, or to increase efforts for making them profitable.

$ Customer profitability allows analysis of the profits generated by a particular customer/customer group within a specific time frame. Measurement involves calculating the difference between the revenue generated by the customer and the costs associated with that customer relationship.

Often, it is quite difficult to make such measurement, to quantify all revenue and all costs associated with one customer. For example, in terms of revenue, to simplify things, companies often measure the value of the customer purchases performed in that data capture period. But customers can generate revenue by making a recommendation of the company to another customer that will make a purchase based on that. Or even by word-of-mouth advertising, dispensing the company of the costs for that advertising. So, companies will focus on the clear money flows with the customers.

Measurement can be facilitated by the use of various customer relationship management software.  At first, the subtraction of the costs from the revenues generated by each customer (or group) is done. Then, customers will be sorted based on profit levels, usually in three categories:

  1. Top Tier: are the most profitable, probably the less price-sensitive and need to be retained. Usually, the strategy is to reward these customers so as to consolidate the relationship with them.
  2. Second Tier: they generate moderate profits, but may have a growth potential, so relationship needs to be fostered with them in the direction of transforming some in top tier customers.
  3. Third Tier: these are the unprofitable customers that affect company results. Efforts could be made in order to moving them to the superior levels, but if they can be identified at very early stages of the relationship, it might be the right thing to dispose of them.

Measuring customer profitability has a retroactive focus, but there is a metric that looks forward in the relationship with the customer: the customer lifetime value.

$ Customer lifetime value calculates the present value of the future cash-flows derived from the relationship with the customer.

It is based on forecasts that envisage the lifetime of a customer, on one hand, and the cash-flows that will be during that period, on the other hand. The value represents the upper limit of what the company is willing to pay to either acquire that customer or maintain the relationship with an existing one.

The calculation is done by multiplying the cash margin of each period to the present value of the estimated length of the customer relationship, as it follows:

$ Customer lifetime value = $ Period margin * [% Retention rate / (1 + % Discount rate - % Retention rate)]

  • $ Period margin represents the per-period cash margin (revenue minus costs)
  • % Retention rate is the rate at which the customer is estimated to be retained, based on past retention rates
  • % Discount rate is the rate by which the future cash flows are brought to present

Many cautions have to be taken into consideration when applying this calculation formula, such as periods of inactivity in customer relationships or variations in the expected cash margin. When these apply, more complex models have to be used for calculation.

Further reading:
Kaplan, S., R. (2005) A Balanced Scorecard Approach To Measure Customer Profitability. Balanced Scorecard Report.
Cokins, G. (2004) How to Measure and Manage Customer Value and Customer Profitability. SAS White Paper.

The KPI Database on smartKPIs.com continues to grow – Over 900 KPI examples published to date

Saturday, December 19th, 2009

www.smartKPIs.com registered users can now select their Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) from over 900 Performance Measures documented and published in the online database. The team focused in the last few days on the  Information Technology and Corporate Social Responsibility.
The functional areas with the highest number of documented measures are:

Within the industry categories, the highest numbers of documented KPIs are in:

Example of a documented performance measure: % Online public procurement

User experience on www.smartKPIs.com

  • Learn: To learn more about performance management and Key Performance Management visit the Resources section.
  • Explore: To explore the library of KPI examples by navigating the functional area and industry directory, visit the Browse KPIs section.
  • Customize: To build your customized KPI library by saving favorite examples for later use, visit the My KPIs section.
  • Contribute: To propose a new example of KPI, visit the Submit KPIs section.
  • Collaborate: To collaborate with other users and to discuss KPI examples, add comments on each KPI description page.

Pricing performance KPIs

Friday, December 18th, 2009

It is widely known that the pricing strategy is one of the core elements of marketing. Dr. Philip Kotler, the father or modern marketing, considers it of the four Ps within the Marketing Mix.

Creating an deploying a pricing strategy can be a complex task, where fundamentals and consequences are to be seen interdependently. A sound pricing strategy ought to consider costs, consumer acceptance and competition prices.

Implementation of the pricing strategy is a homogeneous part of product positioning, therefore things are quite complex. Here are several metrics that help measuring performance and soundness of the pricing strategy and serve as foundations stones for decision-making.

  • # Relative price, also known as # Price premium, compares the price to a benchmark price, most commonly the average price on the market. Construction of this metric is done by dividing the difference between the price and the benchmark price to the latter one. Also, calculation can be done by dividing the % Revenue market share (market share in terms of sales value) to the % Unit market share (market share in terms of sales volume).  If the result equals 1, there is no price premium.  Price premium exists only if value share is greater that volume share. If the result is negative, then there is no price premium, so it means that consumers are not quite willing to pay extra for your product. What ought to be carefully considered here is the price we take into consideration: is it the charged price or the price actually paid by customers? Usually, it is much easier to gather data on the prices that are charged by competition and calculate an average price based on these.
  • $ Reservation price represents that maximum level of charged price above which consumers are not willing to pay.  This metric helps understand the value the consumer places on the product, being useful in estimating demand as a function of various price levels. Finding each customer’s reservation price is extremely difficult and costly, therefore marketers usually resort to measuring another metric: % Good will. This involves focusing on a population on which to test several price levels, asking the respondents whether they consider these levels of “good value” or not.
  • # Price elasticity reflects how consumers respond to small changes in price levels. Calculation is done by dividing the % change in quantity demanded to the % change in price. The result can help anticipating how sensitive will be the demand in case of price changes.

These are three major performance measures that are of great use in assessing pricing strategy effectiveness and consumer responsiveness to this. Of course, other issues can arise in management of pricing strategies. For example, for an interesting article on a particular issue that can arise in pricing – the prisoner’s dilemma – we recommend you read more about the pricing war between Wal-Mart and Amazon on top-selling hardcover books.

Notes:

  • For more insight on pricing, we recommend: De Michael V. Marn, Eric V. Roegner, Craig C. Zawada (2004) The price advantage. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey (available on Google Books).
  • If you are a pricing professional or your activity involves in pricing-related issues, you might find of interest visiting the Professional Pricing Society.

800 Performance Measures on smartKPIs.com – Select your KPIs

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

smartKPIs.com registered users can now select their Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) from over 800 Performance Measures documented and published in the online database. The team focused in the last few days on the  Information Technology and Corporate Social Responsibility.
The functional areas with the highest number of documented measures are:

Within the industry categories, the highest numbers of documented KPIs are in:

Example of a documented performance measure: % Same store sales growth

User experience on www.smartKPIs.com

  • Learn: To learn more about performance management and Key Performance Management visit the Resources section.
  • Explore: To explore the library of KPI examples by navigating the functional area and industry directory, visit the Browse KPIs section.
  • Customize: To build your customized KPI library by saving favorite examples for later use, visit the My KPIs section.
  • Contribute: To propose a new example of KPI, visit the Submit KPIs section.
  • Collaborate: To collaborate with other users and to discuss KPI examples, add comments on each KPI description page.

Brand performance measurement – a deep dive into consumer attitudes and beliefs

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

blog-photo

In a previous post (“Marketing performance: measuring brand equity“) we have reviewed the concept of brand equity and the various methodologies suggested by practitioners and academics for measuring it. Today’s blog post aims to clarify several brand dimensions used in measuring performance in branding.

The performance measures that we consider of interest in this context are the following:

  • % Brand awareness - refers to the population that is aware (i.e. has heard of the brand) from the total target population. When measuring brand awareness, a particular attention needs to be given to the methodology: will prompted or unprompted awareness be measured?
  • % Brand knowledge – extends awareness to population that besides being aware of the brand, have some knowledge of that brand. Here, too, knowledge can be prompted or unprompted and, most important, a clear definition of the knowledge should be developed (What kind of data should consumers know about the brand and at what extend so as to be considered they have “brand knowledge”?).
  • % Top of mind - measures the population that indicates the brand as coming first on their mind when asked to mention brand names for a particular type of product. It can give indication on brand preference, yet its relevance can be lowered by the fact of being the result of the most recent advertisement seen or contact had with the brand, rather than the result of a long-term experience.
  • % Brand preference – refers to the population that chooses the brand over competitor brands. The battle to gain consumer preference is a continuous one, as failing to deliver the brand promise can determine immediate switch to competition and therefore a switch in brand preference. The goal for each brand is to become the upmarket brand – the first in the list of brands consumers prefer the most.
  • % Brand coherence – measures the population that believes correlation between various brand attributes exists. Coherence or incoherence are rather difficult to measure, as people fail or don’t bother to analyze subtle brand attributes. Still, obvious incoherence can have negative impact on the brand. This happened with Pepsi, which tried twice to introduce new concepts that lacked to correlate with the attribute of brown that consumers associate with Pepsi – it is the case of Pepsi Blue in 2002 and Pepsi Crystal in 1992. Both faced strong resistance on behalf of the customers.

Notes

These are only some of the brand performance measures. Practice and literature reveal various models of measuring brand performance that integrate various brand measures. No matter the integrated model used, or even developing own concept of what to measure, when and how, organizations need to have clear understanding of the dimensions they measure and well-articulated methodologies (in terms of target groups, periods of measurement, survey questions etc.).

Limitations

Gathering performance data for these measures is generally done through consumer surveys. This makes the measurement rather expensive and subject to consumer subjectivity (which can translate into dishonesty in some cases).

Purpose

Still, they are helpful in assessing a brand ’s position within its relevant market and consumer beliefs and attitudes towards it. Whereas market and sales results measures reflect actual consumer behavior (frequency of purchases, dormancy rates etc.), brand dimensions help understand consumer attitudes that enhance and influence this behavior. They involve deep dives into customer perceptions, attitudes and beliefs, all of these standing at the base of their actual actions in respect to the physical product that the brand encompasses.


Further reading

Rajagopal (2008), “Measuring brand performance through metrics application”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp 29-38.

Forethought Research (2009), “At Last! Brand Measurement Equals Brand Performance”, available at: http://www.forethought.com.au/documents/162-At_Last__Brand_Measurement_Equals_Brand_Performance.pdf.

Over 700 KPIs documented on smartKPIs.com

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

With more than 150 KPIs published during the month of November, smartKPIs.com reached and already passed the 700 published KPIs milestone.
The functional areas with the highest number of documented KPIs are:

Within the industry categories, the highest numbers of documented KPIs are in:

Example of a documented KPI: % Performance appraisals completed on time

smartkpiscom-documented-kpi-example

User experience on www.smartKPIs.com

  • Learn: To learn more about performance management and Key Performance Management visit the Resources section.
  • Explore: To explore the library of KPI examples by navigating the functional area and industry directory, visit the Browse KPIs section.
  • Customize: To build your customized KPI library by saving favorite examples for later use, visit the My KPIs section.
  • Contribute: To propose a new example of KPI, visit the Submit KPIs section.
  • Collaborate: To collaborate with other users and to discuss KPI examples, add comments on each KPI description page.